Editorial Policy

How Canvasourse reviews teacher AI prompts

Canvasourse is built for teachers who need practical prompt starting points, examples, and lightweight builders. The editorial goal is to make each page useful for a specific teaching workflow while keeping teacher judgment in charge.

Editorial standards

A page should help a teacher complete a real job: planning a lesson, creating practice work, drafting a quiz, building a rubric, writing a parent email, or adapting a classroom routine. Pages are organized around those jobs so readers can quickly decide whether the prompt fits their situation.

• The prompt starts from a real classroom task, not a generic AI feature.
• The template asks for grade level, subject, learning goal, format, and constraints when useful.
• The page reminds teachers to review accuracy, tone, privacy, and classroom fit.
• Examples avoid private student information and avoid asking readers to paste sensitive records into AI tools.
• Related pages help teachers continue the workflow instead of hitting a dead end.

Responsible AI boundaries

Canvasourse prompts are starting points, not final classroom materials. Teachers should check AI output for factual accuracy, age appropriateness, accessibility, standards alignment, bias, tone, and privacy before sharing it with students, families, or colleagues.

Originality and usefulness

The site avoids scraped article rewrites and generic prompt dumping. Prompt examples are arranged with classroom context, expected output, review notes, and related teacher tasks so each page contributes something beyond a bare list.

Updates and corrections

Pages may be revised when examples are unclear, when a better workflow is found, or when a reader reports a safety or clarity issue. To suggest a correction, use the contact page and include the page URL and the prompt title.